Re: Re: [RFC][VOTE] Enable session.use_strict_mode by default

Hi! > The vote will end in 2 hours and 2 more in favor is required to pass at least. > > I don't know the reason why some of us against this RFC, but vote is > the vote. My guess is you prefer more precise timestamp based session > managed which has declined. The number of votes (7) suggests most people either don't care or don't understand the issue enough to vote. Note that default is not necessary to run a secure setup, strictly speaking - you can always recommend using non-default setting. It'd be useful to hear from people voting "no" of course. -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com