Re: [RFC] orphan extensions cleanup

Hi! >> enchant: >> I thought Pierre maintained enchant? Despite it haven't had much real >> activity for years > > Well there are not much changes in the api. > > And it works. So -1 here. Wait, -1 for what? Having a maintainer? How that makes sense? OK, there's no changes in API, but tomorrow comes security issue - who's going to take care of it? Would we just ship knowingly broken code then and not even tell users? >> gettext >> WordPress can optionally use gettext for some of their po/mo files, >> I'm not entirely sure how this is today[1], but it might be worth >> taking into consideration if there are other users. > > Here as much as I do not like it. I have to oppose it. That is a major > breakage (no, pecl is not the same). What is major breakage - having a maintainer for this extension? I'm sorry, I don't understand it. -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com