Re: Re: pdo_dblib on pecl
| From: | Rowan Collins | Date: | Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:38:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: pdo_dblib on pecl | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-95986@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 13/09/2016 14:07, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
On 13.09.2016 at 14:53, Adam Baratz wrote:It seems to come up on this list semi-regularly that there are extensions which exist in both php-src and PECL, with various statuses. PECL is also considered the official "attic" for extensions which are no longer supported in php-src. I wonder if there's anything we can do to make this relationship cleaner. For instance - and consider this a straw man because I haven't thought it through at all - could supported extensions by managed in PECL's version control with special "official PHP build" branches / releases? That way, pecl.php.net could show the correct support status as a matter of course. Regards, -- Rowan Collins [IMSoP]I noticed that there's a stale version of a supported package on pecl: https://pecl.php.net/package/pdo_dblib Should this be removed to avoid confusion?Alternatively a note might be added, as it has been done for PECL/domxml, for instance. Either way, that should also be done for PECL/PDO_SQLITE and PECL/sqlite3. And the out-dated note for PECL/SQLite should be fixed.