Re: [RFC] OpenSSL BigNum support

> Looks ok to me. Would probably not hurt also add tests for various error > conditions. > There's one TypeError test in there, but I can easily add more. (And probably will on my flight tomorrow.) > I realise this is only exposing functionality already available with > OpenSSL but is it worth adding tests that cover some arbitrary precision > arithmetic? The tests at the moment cover integers that PHP already > handles natively without requiring either GMP or BCMath. > This type of test is certainly worth including. I'll add some it these as well. I'm mostly curious about thoughts on API decisions. For example: Do we want this in a namespace? Would we rather match GMP's function based API for consistency? I like the decisions I made, but I can imagine disagreement. -Sara