Re: PDO::PARAM_DOUBLE
| From: | Adam Baratz | Date: | Wed, 07 Dec 2016 22:37:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PDO::PARAM_DOUBLE | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-97332@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
>
> For decimal, double wouldn't be the correct type anyway, as it could
> cause loss of precision.
>
Sure, agree the name is imprecise. "Double" is mainly relevant to zvals.
> Is there a reason PDO::PARAM_DOUBLE doesn't exist?
>
> I don't know if there's am historical reason. I think it should be
> there, but to be honest, I'm not sure it's worth the effort at this point.
Say more on why you don't think there'd be a payoff? I'd think that it
would be worth taking the (I'm guessing) max. 3 days involved to add
missing functionality to a widely-used extension.