Re: Redesign of bugs.php.net

W dniu 23.01.2017 o 09:44, Andreas Heigl pisze:

Am 23.01.17 um 08:22 schrieb Maciej Sobaczewski:

Hello, I know it's bringing the same thread again but since my last post[1] I gathered some feedback on /r/php, including a few membmers of PHP.net. https://github.com/Sobak/bugsnet-redesign-mockup this is the repo for my experimental approach on redesigning PHP.net. Short story: I took the design of php.net main website and after some modifications used it for our bugtracker. Long story? All details are in the repo's README file. At the moment, this is just a static mockup but I'm ready to start feature branch on web/bugs as soon as I get your opinions. Make sure to read section on Functional changes[2] I'd like to happen. I know these should be separated from the redesign but I limited myself to suggestions which are strictly connected to the interface/UX. What are your thoughts? Does it look good? Can I start the branch or you prefer something entirely different/leaving it as-is? CC'ed to php.internals to make sure it'll reach most of bugsnet users. [1]: http://news.php.net/php.webmaster/25510 [2]: https://github.com/Sobak/bugsnet-redesign-mockup#functional-changes

Great work! Thanks. Here are my personal thougts: 1. Shouldn't we talk about "issues" instead of "bugs"? One of the types clearly is "bug" but the tracker should also contain stuff that aren'T bugs so "issues" seems more appropriate. And yes, I wouldn't rename the whole thing to issues.php.net even though that would better fit in my eyes ;) 2. On creating an issue I'd put the Issue-Title right on top: Bold and large. Everything else is then detail… Apart from that I'd really love a feature to edit multiple issues at once. But that's something for a later stage! I'm definitely looking forward to seeing that going live in the near future! Cheers Andreas

Hi Andreas, 1) I'd like to handle such changes separately. Diff between eventual branches to review and merge is going to be quite big anyway. 2) Right, I'll move it to the top. We'll see how would it look bolded, I consider it only a proposal which is a subject to change. Thanks, Maciej.