Re: Re: Bug Reports Targeting Ancient PECL Extensions

Am 29.03.17 um 12:52 schrieb Christoph M. Becker: > On 28.03.2017 at 23:49, Thomas Punt wrote: > >> There doesn't appear to be a status quo on what to do with bug reports targeting >> >> PECL extensions that seem completely unmaintained (i.e. no releases in many years - >> >> such as bug reports for the SAM extension[1][2]). Would anyone have any objections >> >> if I closed such reports with a "Won't Fix," given their abandoned status? I >> know Kalle >> >> has tagged some of these bug reports with "Suspended," but given the unlikeliness >> >> of these extensions ever being revived, it seems unnecessary to keep such bug >> >> reports lying around in the bugs DB. From my POV I'd only ask for a "template-comment" along the line of "As the extension isn't maintained since <inser year> there won't be a fix for this issue. We're therefore closing it now." Apart from that I'm fine with it :) My 0.02€ Cheers Andreas -- ,,, (o o) +---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+ | Andreas Heigl | | mailto:andreas@heigl.org N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" | | http://andreas.heigl.org http://hei.gl/wiFKy7 | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://hei.gl/root-ca | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+

Attachment: [application/pkcs7-signature] S/MIME Cryptographic Signature smime.p7s