Re: [RFC][VOTE] Improve hash_hkdf() parameter

From: Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 23:07:19 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC][VOTE] Improve hash_hkdf() parameter
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-98778@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi Joe, On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org> wrote: > This RFC was left open for 5 days past the end of voting as declared on > the RFC. > Thank you, I forgot about this. IMHO, it's a shame for us we should have inconsistent and insecure function signature for a new function. I'm going to update the manual to add warning notes and example usages like advanced CRFS token dedicated for specific URL with expiration time. I can think of length option only usage, but I cannot think usage that could be useful for majority of PHP users like advanced CSRF token. Andrey, Could you give us some length only and length/info only example that could be useful for most PHP users. It should be safe and recommended usage. I suppose you should have some good examples. Thank you. -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net

« previous php.internals (#98778) next »