Re: Extensions License
| From: | Fleshgrinder | Date: | Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:35:37 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Extensions License | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-99527@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 6/13/2017 8:23 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> All extensions in php-src are PHP 3.01 Licensed
> (libs may, of course, have different license)
>
> Is there any strong rule about this ?
> Or is it OK to have a BSD Licensed extension ?
>
> Context: see sodium PR
> https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/2560
>
>
> IMHO, make sense to have only PHP Licensed ext.
>
>
>
> Remi
>
We also include GNU stuff:
https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/6053987bc27e8dede37f437193a5cad448f99bce/ext/mbstring/libmbfl/LICENSE
I cannot tell what implications this has, and do not want to make any
judgment regarding this issue.
--
Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc