Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Namespaces in Core

On 6/3/2017 6:40 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote: > Next promised RFC (and the last one for this weekend): > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaces-in-core > > I am unsure about whether we should avoid the usage of abbreviations for > things like language (lang), standard (std), and utility (util). I think > it is not necessary to write them out fully, but, well, ...?!? > Bump! Voting could start tomorrow, but I would like to wait for the outcome of the class naming [1] RFC and update this one before going to vote. I also believe that there is actually still the need for further discussion here. @Nikita you are always quoted in this context. I would love to hear your feedback on the RFC. I still believe that I addressed your concerns, and actually agree with you. I hope that you understand the examples as, well, examples. @All I would still love some feedback on the open issues. I would also be happy if you have ideas how the RFC could be made clearer. I know that many want to see namespaces in core, this is a chance. Otherwise we need to wait at least six months before a new proposal can be voted on (see rule). [1] https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class-naming -- Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc