Re: [RFC]Discuss] Syntax for Arrow Functions

> I just think your example is an exaggeration to what happens in practice. I think it's an example of what happens with any inconsistent feature in any language. On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Markus Fischer <markus@fischer.name> wrote: > Hello Rasmus, > > On 19.06.17 22:22, Rasmus Schultz wrote: > >> If I have to factor back and forth between new and old syntax every time a >> closure changes from one to multiple or back to one statement, then, >> frankly, what's the point? >> >> I think I would just keep using the old syntax, then - for consistency, >> and >> to save myself the frustration of factoring back and forth. >> > > I'm writing closures every day and it's so rare to have this changes from > single/multiple I don't even remember. I think in practice this is a > non-issue except for very rare special cases and, don't forget: it's > optional, you don't have to. > > In my opinion, if this is worth doing, it's worth doing it right. >> > > No counter-argument here :) > > I just think your example is an exaggeration to what happens in practice. > > - Markus > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >