Re: [RFC] [Vote] Doxygen

HI Joe, 2017-06-26 8:43 GMT+02:00 Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org>: > Morning, > > I also voted no for similar reasons to Anatol. > > This is not really a thing that needs a vote, this is a thing that requires > the handful of people who are actually able to document ZE to spend > considerable time doing so. In addition it requires a commitment from the > community of developers to continue to maintain, and introduce inline > documentation with new code. > > Additionally, I'm a little concerned that an RFC that has the potential to > touch every single source file has gone to vote with a simple majority. It > would seem that we are deciding that new code must be documented in this > specific way, to say nothing of the massive task of documenting existing > code. That would seem to be a decision that could effect everybody that > works on PHP in perpetuity and a simple majority is nothing like a strong > enough consensus. I'm in the same boat as you and Anatol here. I think it is important to note that all who actively work on the Core/Engine have no except for Stas, which also should be a good indicator that we should be concerned. -- regards, Kalle Sommer Nielsen kalle@php.net