Re: OBJECT_OPERATOR vs. DOUBLE_COLON
| From: | Rowan Collins | Date: | Wed, 05 Jul 2017 15:24:20 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: OBJECT_OPERATOR vs. DOUBLE_COLON | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-99767@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 5 July 2017 13:28:29 BST, "Johannes Schlüter" <johannes@schlueters.de> wrote:
>On Mi, 2017-07-05 at 11:24 +0100, Rowan Collins wrote:
>> Firstly, I'm not sure where you got the names you've put in
>> ALL_CAPS from, but they're not the official names of the operators
>> anywhere I've seen. The double-colon is technically the "Scope
>> Resolution Operator", or internally T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM (which
>> does mean double-colon). It's described in the manual
>> here: http://p
>> hp.net/manual/en/language.oop5.paamayim-nekudotayim.php
>>
>
>We use T_DOUBLE_COLON in reflection:
>
>ext/tokenizer/tokenizer_data.c: REGISTER_LONG_CONSTANT("T_DOUBLE
>_COLON", T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM, CONST_CS | CONST_PERSISTENT);
>ext/tokenizer/tokenizer_data.c: case
>T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM: return "T_DOUBLE_COLON";
>
>and I believe it appears/appeared in other places, too.
Ah, OK, I stand corrected.
Regards,
--
Rowan Collins
[IMSoP]