Re: [RFC] [Voting] Class Naming

On 7/4/2017 11:24 PM, Christoph M. Becker wrote: > Hmm, one might dislike having the coding standards amended in this > regard, but still may have a preference on how it would be changed, if > the change will be accepted. > Haven't thought about it this way, that actually makes sense. What I want to avoid is that anybody thinks that the second poll has any meaning if the first one is a "no". In that case the second one is "nothing". That is basically the point. A vote like you said definitely makes sense, yes. -- Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc