Re: Exposing object handles to userland
| From: | Benjamin Eberlei | Date: | Tue, 11 Jul 2017 16:44:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Exposing object handles to userland | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-99837@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Marco Pivetta <ocramius@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Asking here, since it's not clear to me: is this a good/fitting
> > replacement for
spl_object_hash()?
> >
> > On 11 Jul 2017 7:00 AM, "tyson andre" <tysonandre775@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> >> How long should I wait to see if there are objections before creating
> >> a pull request?
> >> >AFAIK you can create PR any time.
> >>
> >> I created a PR implementing spl_object_id(object $o) : int several days
> >> ago,
> >> at https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/2611
> >> --
> >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >>
> >>
> Yes. spl_object_id() provides the same guarantees as spl_object_hash() --
> but is much faster and has a more compact output (an integer instead of an
> iirc 32 byte string).
>
Just to clarify, that means object ids are still re-used between objects if
one gets destroyed? The initial bug report was about creating a second
function that solves this problem.
>
> Nikita
>