Re: php.net website
| From: | Mathias Grimm | Date: | Fri, 21 Jul 2017 08:31:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: php.net website | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-99988@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
If php is mainly static it could be almost fully cached in a CDN.
For the downloads I don't think the latency would be a problem but that can
also be in the CDN
If php owned two servers in US and two in Europe and possibly 2 in Asia we
would be goon in terms of latency for the search IMO.
On 20 July 2017 at 19:38, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Niklas Keller <me@kelunik.com> wrote:
>>
>> They can also just request them themselves, but only for their mirror
>> domain. If you allow them to issue for www.php.net, you can as well just
>> put the current private key there.
>>
>
> I think there is a big difference between putting the private key there
> and proxying validation for just a www.php.net CN alias. We already have
> a list of known mirrors, so we would make sure to only validate
> www.php.net for those. By validating www.php.net we allow any mirror to
> pretend they are www.php.net and no other *.php.net domain, which is
> exactly what we want.
>
> -Rasmus
>