Re: Re: Legal variable names
| From: | Andi Gutmans | Date: | Wed, 22 Nov 2000 17:20:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Legal variable names | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.lang |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-lang+get-86@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 17:51 22/11/00 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
Let's not make an issue out of it :) I think the "because we can" was meant in a similar way as backwards compatibility. Then again I didn't write it. Andi --- Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com> http://www.zend.com/Sascha, Again, *YES*, unless it's a blunt bug, then 'because we can' is exactly the right reasoning. Why is it legal to write a for loop in PHP? I'll tell you why, because if you do it, it'll work. That's no different.Do I understand you correctly that your explanation is "because we can"?Regardless, the above construct seems to be valid since PHPDo you realize that your explanation is identical to that of Andre? :)3, so it will be part of the specification.Backwards compatibility vs. engineer's "because we can".I don't see how those two criterias are equal.