Re: PHP/FI 2 legacy
| From: | Andi Gutmans | Date: | Sat, 25 Nov 2000 21:02:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP/FI 2 legacy | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.lang |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-lang+get-90@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 09:49 PM 11/25/00 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
old_function() shouldn't be part of the language standard IMO. I can't think of any other things, but we will probably come up with some when we get into the more semantic descriptions. We might want to drop $array[] support and $string[n] for string indexing (using $string{n} instead although I still haven't implemented it). I still haven't had a chance to look at how far you have gotten with describing the grammar. I will try and take a look at it tomorrow. Anyway, I think we will resolve these issues when we start working together on actually describing the stuff. That is something I definitely want to do together but I'm aware that a kick start of drafting the grammar is important to get things rolling. Andi --- Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com> http://www.zend.com/Hi,here are some questions regarding PHP/FI 2 compatibility.1. Are there any legacy features beside the old-function-definition?old-function-definition: 'old_function' function-declarator '(' statement-list ')' ';'2. Should those be part of the PHP Language Standard?