Re: New mirror

Hi, ok, if you think you don't need a new mirror for now it is fine for us. Now you know where to find us if you need a new one within the US. It is setup, working, fast and actual. Even stats are there which most mirrors don't provide. We try to get over 99.98 %uptime a month which isn't too hard to reach having this server located in the NAC datacenter. Best regards *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 08/12/2002 at 11:51 Gabor Hojtsy wrote: >> Unfortunately we could not send this email to gabor@hojtsy.hu. >> See the original email and the transscript below. > >Anyway, please always use "reply all" when replying to mail received >from PHP.net. As you can see, I have also included mirrors@php.net as >a recipient, as there are many people reading this list, and they can >add their thoughts this way to our conversation. > >> we can confirm this. That's why we setup another mirror. Unfortunately >> we can not tell you exactly which mirror times out when. All I know >> this occured many times within the past two years and with all US >> mirrors when we tried to get the latest PHP version or to check >> something in the manual. To check which mirror is bad you would have >> to setup a monitoring software. I wouldn't say to replace a mirror. >> See it that way that the more mirrors you have, the better access >> your php users will have. Anyway, the mirror we setup mirrors all >> languages. > >Well, good service would be to have mirrors nearly always up. If a mirror >has serious problems (because bandwidth limitations for example), then >it should be removed. As we have only one rsync server, we cannot increase >the number of mirrors infinitely. You can see on the mirroring.php page, >that we also have a theoretical two mirrors per country limit (which we >tend to exceed in some situations, for large countries, or countries >with a large PHP userbase). > >Goba