Re: An Acronym really? Maybe not...
| From: | Andrew Lindeman | Date: | Tue, 22 Apr 2003 21:48:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: An Acronym really? Maybe not... | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.mirrors |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-mirrors+get-16909@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hopefully you don't mean for us to say that PHP isn't an acronym, it's
more of an 'abbreviation' :) Come on, we could get technical about a
lot of things in this world, but it's a lot easier to just keep it the
way it is, even if slightly wrong, than confuse a lot of people :)
--Andrew
On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 16:33, Aaron L Burgemeister wrote:
> Acronym: a word (as NATO, radar, or snafu) formed from the initial letter
> or letters of each of the successive parts or major parts of a compound
> term
>
> As noted above, NATO, radar and snafu are all pronouncable without saying
> "N-A-T-O, R-A-D-A-R, S-N-A-F-U", etc. So is PHP really a recursive
> acronym or is acronym a word everybody likes to use to describe an
> abbreviation?
>
> Just curious.
>
> Aaron
>
--
Andrew Lindeman <alindeman@php.net>