Re: cvs: phpweb / my.php

From: Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 20:48:29 +0000
Subject: Re: cvs: phpweb / my.php
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.mirrors 
Request: Send a blank email to php-mirrors+get-17080@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 07:28, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > > OK, I'll revert it if you want, but 'en, en' just looked abnormal to > > me. It didn't say something like 'en-gb, en-us', just 'en, en' > > and that > > looked repetitive... > > Maybe it is. But in my eyes, it's goal is to show how we represented the > user's language settings. We do not support 'en-gb' or 'en-us'. It is > not > perfectly in conformance with the RFC to just go back to 'en' in these cases, > but we do this, as we have no other choice. So this way the user can see, > that the languages he selected are there, but stripped down. > > BTW I don't have any hard feelings against the current state, I can live with > it, but I think the output before your change was better ;) > I don't mean to argue the point, but I don't really see how listing a language twice (e.g. 'en, en') helps users any. Maybe if it didn't strip off the hyphen part (e.g. My browser sends an accept language of 'en-us' and 'en'). While pretty much the same, and we don't have a manual for each (duh!), if you really want a user to see what their browser is returning, why strip that part out and display the edited form twice? Maybe I'm wrong, but returning the exact same thing twice to the user seems rather pointless to me. Cheers --Andrew

« previous php.mirrors (#17080) next »