Re: cvs: phpweb / links.php
| From: | stuart cochrane | Date: | Fri, 06 Jun 2003 20:13:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: phpweb / links.php | ||
| Groups: | php.mirrors | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-mirrors+get-18550@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
first of all, i think this is totally wrong to remove this link on its own -
fine if you dont like sites that have some banners (my site only has one ad banner, the rest are contest sponsors and site partners) then it only fair to remove them all (and not just one).
the site has lots of original content - granted the manual is the offical php one (why have anything else?) - if this is not allowed i will remove them straight away.
I have many users that like the site - I run contests to help beginers learn more techniques and lets them win prizes. I started this site to help give php developers a real list of upto date editors.
I think theres a bit of favouritism going on here, after looking at all the other listed sites (and the new ones you added today alone) im very surprise you have singled out this one. Hmmm, something is a bit fishy. But your the boss.
From: Gabor Hojtsy <gabor@hojtsy.hu> To: Andrew Lindeman <alindeman@php.net> CC: php-mirrors@lists.php.net, stuartc1@hotmail.com Subject: Re: cvs: phpweb / links.php Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 18:22:55 +0200_________________________________________________________________ On the move? Get Hotmail on your mobile phone http://www.msn.co.uk/msnmobile+<li><a href="http://www.php-editors.com">PHP-Editors.com</a><br> +A comprehensive list of PHP related editors reviewed with user comments.</li>Just a note that I have not added this site because I don't think it can be regarded as a 'comprehensive list'. It has very few original content, but has popups, has a very high load of advertising on the right and left side. It also has a ripped of copy of the PHP manual seemes to be downloaded from php.he.net.... So this does not seem to be one site with valuable content I would list on the links page. Or if it has valuable content, it is hidden deeply behind the advertising. If it is an 'error of webmaster@php.net' - as the link submitter worded it - not to reply to all link requests then let it be. The links page is already too big, and I myself try to keep it list valuable sites, which I can only decide by my own liking of course ;) The link list is getting to be big enough that I as a user would not be able to find the site I am looking for by using it. It also gives worse pagerank to any of the sites trying to get on there to gain some pagerank, as if the link number is high on a page, the sites get a very low pagerank... Goba