note 72508 added to function.empty
| From: | Stephen at osu1 dot php dot net | Date: | Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:08:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | note 72508 added to function.empty | ||
| Groups: | php.notes | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-notes+get-122032@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I wanted to correct a couple of errors in some earlier user notes, regarding which is better, using
empty() within an if clause to be evaluated, or using only the variable. E.g.:
if (!$blah)
versus
if (empty($blah))
or
if ($blah)
versus
if (!empty($blah))
First, one person noted that empty() is basically worthless because you don't need it to do the
above functionality. However, I think this is wrong for 2 reasons:
1. It is needed for arrays and (I think) objects
2. empty() is actually FASTER than using just the variable. You might think that it would be slower
because it looks like a function, but it is actually a language construct. Apparently it is
optimized. It is at least 10% faster, sometimes nearly 20% faster.
Second, one person claimed that if you don't use empty, and just test the variable, you will
get an E_WARNING error. I don't know if this used to be true, but for me in PHP 5.2, it only
generates an E_NOTICE.
I hope this clears up somebody's confusion.
----
Server IP: 216.194.113.175
Probable Submitter: 68.163.200.198
----
Manual Page -- http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.empty.php
Edit -- https://master.php.net/note/edit/72508
Del: integrated -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/72508/integrated
Del: useless -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/72508/useless
Del: bad code -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/72508/bad+code
Del: spam -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/72508/spam
Del: non-english -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/72508/non-english
Del: in docs -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/72508/in+docs
Del: other reasons-- https://master.php.net/note/delete/72508
Reject -- https://master.php.net/note/reject/72508
Search -- https://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php