note 75126 added to ref.curl

From: Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 03:51:06 +0000
Subject: note 75126 added to ref.curl
Groups: php.notes 
Request: Send a blank email to php-notes+get-126573@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Many people still use the fopen wrappers, file_get_contents(), or even include() to open files across the internet. The issue with this is that they were not designed to do so and they are inefficient in doing so. Curl is a great alternative to these and isn't much harder to use. It even beats out the use of sockets in fairly default configurations. I have created a script that tests all 4 methods on 20 different websites 10 times each. The results are clear, here is one set of the results: Curl time: 43.02 seconds FGC time: 86.48 seconds Fopen time: 86.34 seconds Socket time: 44.91 seconds As you can see, there is little performance difference between file_get_contents and fopen/fread. Likewise, there is little difference between curl and sockets. You may use the test to see the results in realtime if you'd like: http://trucex.com/curltest.php ---- Server IP: 64.71.164.2 Probable Submitter: 68.84.197.115 ---- Manual Page -- http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.curl.php Edit -- https://master.php.net/note/edit/75126 Del: integrated -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/75126/integrated Del: useless -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/75126/useless Del: bad code -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/75126/bad+code Del: spam -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/75126/spam Del: non-english -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/75126/non-english Del: in docs -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/75126/in+docs Del: other reasons-- https://master.php.net/note/delete/75126 Reject -- https://master.php.net/note/reject/75126 Search -- https://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php

« previous php.notes (#126573) next »