Re: Re: note 84622 rejected and deleted from function.fgetcsv by notes editor danbrown

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Douglas Purdy <gdpurdy@yahoo.com> wrote: > My post did not >> ask questions, report bugs or suggest new features; > it clarified the very sparse documentation for the fgetcsv function. > It should be re-posted. We reject notes of that type because it would be better suited as a suggestion and bug report that will help to improve the official documentation. Please instead report your findings at http://bugs.php.net/ as a documentation bug, where we can incorporate it as a permanent entry into the official manual as opposed to a temporary user note. The reason behind this is that most people will just read the documentation page itself, and then restate what was said in your note. As a result, the pages get cluttered with many duplicate posts. In addition, many third-party websites will mirror the manual entries, but not the user notes. By reporting findings such as yours as a bug, you're doing an even greater job of helping the community than providing a user note which may or may not even be read. If you have any further questions, comments, or complaints, please feel free to let us know via this mailing list and we'll be happy to look into it. And thank you very much for your continued support of the project. -- </Daniel P. Brown> Better prices on dedicated servers: Intel 2.4GHz/60GB/512MB/2TB $49.99/mo. Intel 3.06GHz/80GB/1GB/2TB $59.99/mo. Dedicated servers, VPS, and hosting from $2.50/mo.