note 87834 deleted from language.oop5 by thiago

Note Submitter: jordancdarwin at googlemail dot com ---- In response to Jeffrey, by definition, the first example of code was more simplistic; less operations are required to facilitate it's end result, less parsing, and it is small enough to be easily understood by humans at a glance, or rather more-so than the second example. Not to disagree with the fact that Object Oriented code isn't simple, but just to point out that OOP tends to make things simpler in the long-run due to the use of patterns and architectures that simplify procedures shared between software designs, which tend to be re-declared in procedural code. :)