Re: Re: note 87919 rejected and deleted from function.define by notes editor thiago
| From: | Daniel Brown | Date: | Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:17:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: note 87919 rejected and deleted from function.define by notes editor thiago | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.notes |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-notes+get-148694@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 14:13, Thiago H. Pojda <thiago.pojda@gmail.com> wrote:
> Martin,
>
> IMO your note is good.
>
> Your note was rejected for a bigger reason than just removing it from
> the notes section.
>
> I rejected it to make you bring this up on PHP mailing lists to
> discuss it and then, if decided so, add a observation to that into the
> real docs. I'll be deleting the others about this subject soon.
>
> You can report it as a bug, if you will.
Thiago is correct, Martin. And while the canned email sent upon
rejection seems a little harsh, it's meant to be direct, as a good
portion of the user note submitters from the community are not
native-English-speakers. It's certainly not meant to be read as
contemptuous.
Essentially, a rejection is a reminder that corrections - even to
user notes - should be reported using means other than the notes
submission form itself; in the future, if you submit this as a bug to
http://bugs.php.net/ with either a link to the note or the note
number, it will be handled as appropriate. The offending note will
then be corrected (with credit to the user who supplied the correction
noted therein) or removed from the manual entirely.
In any case, thank you very much for your submission, and have a
great new year!
--
</Daniel P. Brown>
daniel.brown@parasane.net || danbrown@php.net
http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/
Unadvertised dedicated server deals, too low to print - email me to find out!