RE: note 90218 rejected and deleted from function.get-headers by notes editor danbrown

Hi, The note I added was clearly appropriate as it related to the prior 2 notes, and provided additional information to these notes. " The user contributed notes are not an appropriate place to ask questions, report bugs or suggest new features" I did neither! My note was an enhancement to an existing post. -----Original Message----- From: php-notes@lists.php.net [mailto:php-notes@lists.php.net] Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 12:40 PM To: paul@webtop-designs.com Subject: note 90218 rejected and deleted from function.get-headers by notes editor danbrown You are receiving this email because your note posted to the online PHP manual has been removed by one of the editors. Read the following paragraphs carefully, because they contain pointers to resources better suited for requesting support or reporting bugs, none of which are to be included in manual notes because there are mechanisms and groups in place to deal with those issues. The user contributed notes are not an appropriate place to ask questions, report bugs or suggest new features; please use the resources listed on <http://php.net/support> for those purposes. This was clearly stated in the page you used to submit your note, please carefully re-read those instructions before submitting future contributions. Bug submissions and feature requests should be entered at <http://bugs.php.net/>. For documentation errors use the bug system, and classify the bug as "Documentation problem". Support and ways to find answers to your questions can be found at <http://php.net/support>. Your note has been removed from the online manual. ----- Copy of your note below ----- Why use string searching functions at all? Typecast the responseCode to an int and simply see if it falls between a certain range. Using string functions to match a number is just wrong! __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3999 (20090410) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3999 (20090410) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com