note 100602 modified in function.serialize by danbrown
| From: | danbrown@php.net | Date: | Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:15:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | note 100602 modified in function.serialize by danbrown | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.notes |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-notes+get-173469@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
i did a benchmark between serialization and json_serialize and i found that serialize is 12% fast
than json_encode (no tag, php 5.2.12).
I used this array as a example of serialization (10'000 iterations)
<?php
$arr=array(
"in"=>array("in1"=>"valin1","in2"=>506,"in33"=>"valin3")
,"out"=>array("in1"=>"valin1","in2"=>"valin2"));
?>
and unserialize is 70% fast than json_decode.
in conclusion:
a) as expected, serialize is the fast way to.. ahem, serialize objects and array (at least for some
complex cases).
b) but json produce a smaller string (and is more standard).
--was--
i did a benchmark between serialization and json_serialize and i found that serialize is 12% fast
than json_encode (no tag, php 5.2.12).
I used this array as a example of serialization (10'000 iterations)
<?
$arr=array(
"in"=>array("in1"=>"valin1","in2"=>506,"in33"=>"valin3")
,"out"=>array("in1"=>"valin1","in2"=>"valin2"));
?>
and unserialize is 70% fast than json_decode.
in conclusion:
a) as expected, serialize is the fast way to.. ahem, serialize objects and array (at least for some
complex cases).
b) but json produce a smaller string (and is more standard).
http://php.net/manual/en/function.serialize.php