Re: Regarding Note ID 105823 on php.net

On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:02:28 +0530, Daniel Brown <danbrown@php.net> wrote:

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:19, Anshul Agrawal <anshul@designgrill.com> wrote:

Hi Dan, I came to know that you had to delete the note from the website. (http://news.php.net/php.notes/183258) It would be a great help if you can let me know the rationale behind it. IMHO, the note aptly adds more info to the content provided on the page.

    Because it was redundant.  Your note said:

        The example above will show its real power of executing the

task in parallel when at leat two instances of worker are running simultaneously.

    The heading of the example on that exact page says:

        In this exmple, the basic reverse client extended to run two

tasks in parallel....

    Essentially, your note said the exact same thing.  If you truly

believe you have a valid point, perhaps rewording it so it doesn't repeat what's already there would be your best option.

Thats exactly the reason I had to write the note. The title says it all fine but the example output shown on the page shows the task is being done serially and not parallely. That's because only one worker was running to complete the task. You need minimum of two workers running simultaneously to have the tasks execute in parallel which would also change the example output. - Anshul