note 114145 added to function.readfile
| From: | smilepet dot 26 at gmail dot com | Date: | Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:10:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | note 114145 added to function.readfile | ||
| Groups: | php.notes | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-notes+get-198249@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I see this type of comment everywhere "this isn't the problem but it also wouldn't
hurt to remove the Content-Transfer-Encoding header field. It doesn't exist in HTTP.". My
question is if "Content-Transfer-Encoding" is really unnecessary, why does this is
included in the above example from PHP Group? Because of this example usage, we could find the same
kind of script being written again and again everywhere. Is there something wrong in this use?
----
Server IP: 72.55.140.6
Probable Submitter: 59.92.1.14
----
Manual Page -- http://php.net/manual/en/function.readfile.php
Edit -- https://master.php.net/note/edit/114145
Del: integrated -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/114145/integrated
Del: useless -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/114145/useless
Del: bad code -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/114145/bad+code
Del: spam -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/114145/spam
Del: non-english -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/114145/non-english
Del: in docs -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/114145/in+docs
Del: other reasons-- https://master.php.net/note/delete/114145
Reject -- https://master.php.net/note/reject/114145
Search -- https://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php