note 25828 rejected from features.persistent-connections by spic
| From: | spic@php.net | Date: | Tue, 08 Oct 2002 07:51:32 +0000 |
| Subject: | note 25828 rejected from features.persistent-connections by spic | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.notes |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-notes+get-37773@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Ok i understand why persistant connections would be less traffic on the network and a little faster
to access the mysql server, But are they more load on the MySQL server then having to open a
connection all the time? Is non persistant better if all i am worried about is load direcly on the
mysql server and i am not concerd about any extra traffic caused on the lan?
How as has tested this I tier both ways and I realy tell sometimes one seems better then the other
but not always and I would like to know you realy prefer. It kind of looks to me the non-persistant
is better but i am not realy sure here. Sorry for the stupid question