note 30970 added to faq.languages
| From: | Web at rack1 dot php dot net | Date: | Fri, 04 Apr 2003 19:39:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | note 30970 added to faq.languages | ||
| Groups: | php.notes | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-notes+get-46233@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Sounds like this FAQ needs to be updated.
How about ASP.NET and .NET Framework?
How about ColdFusion MX?
PHP has limited/None out-of-the-box database integration with popular RDBMS(Oracle,SQL Server),
integration with COM and to Java Servlet and Enterprise Javabeans, that alone make ColdFusion MX and
ASP.NET an attractive development platform.
PHP might be good for developing non complex websites for no cost; however when you are developing
enterprise web systems that have to integrate with many different flavor of sources .. php does not
have the out-of-the-box functionality for the above needs.
"PHP is commonly said to be faster and more efficient for complex programming tasks and trying
out new ideas. PHP is generally referred to as more stable and less resource intensive as well.
"
I like to see proof of this statement. How is a interpreted languge faster and less resource
intensive than a compiled languge(JSP,ASP.NET, and ColdFusion MX)?
ColdFusion MX Server cost about $1300, but the total built in functionality and versatility makes it
a worthwhile. If you start out with PHP, ask yourself how much time and money you have in developing
the source to provide the functionality you are looking for.
PHP vs ColdFusion MX
http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/mx/coldfusion/articles/php_cfmx.html
--
http://www.php.net/manual/en/faq.languages.php
http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=edit+30970
http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=delete+30970
http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=reject+30970