note 31077 added to faq.languages

From: Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 05:23:40 +0000
Subject: note 31077 added to faq.languages
Groups: php.notes 
Request: Send a blank email to php-notes+get-46390@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
As far as I can see, Web Consultant apparently missed the topic, which was "3. PHP vs. Cold Fusion", not "PHP vs. compiled languages (JSP,ASP.NET, and ColdFusion MX)". We probably all agree that PHP, compared to what ColdFusion was at the time of the writing of that part of this FAQ, is far more capable of complex scripts, and also generally outperforms ColdFusion in similar tasks, too. I'm not familiar with ColdFusion MX, but as it sounds like it's a rather new product, I would draw the conclusion that it isn't what the writer of this FAQ had in mind when addressing PHP vs. ColdFusion comparisons. Surely, Web Consultant must have made the same conclusion based on his discovery that the FAQ is outdated and thus should be updated. cheers. -- http://www.php.net/manual/en/faq.languages.php http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=edit+31077 http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=delete+31077 http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=reject+31077

« previous php.notes (#46390) next »