note 30010 deleted from language.references.pass by sniper

From: Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 01:24:36 +0000
Subject: note 30010 deleted from language.references.pass by sniper
References: 1  Groups: php.notes 
Request: Send a blank email to php-notes+get-57338@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Note Submitter: phpdocs@regs.nebcorp.com ---- Regarding the speed of passing via reference as opposed to passing (by default) via value: Passing by reference will always be quicker, as the overhead of copying data around in memory will *not* be incurred. Then why did the previous poster seem to see a 5% performance advantage in when testing? You'll note that the first test performed was the one using pass-by-reference, rather than the pass by value. Had the order of the tests be reversed, I'm fairly certain the results would have been reversed. Why? Filesystem caching. The slowest thing in the whole test would be the disk I/O to read the file itself. By the time the second (pass-by-value) test is run, all the data has been cached in memory by the OS. But regardless, speed is not the main reason to do pass by reference (unless you're dealing with rather large data structures, in which case it will improve both speed and memory footprint). The main reason is to be able to pass data structure around and manipulate them.

« previous php.notes (#57338) next »