note 44653 added to function.imagecopyresampled

Two comments regarding imageCopyResampleBicubic() published here. Quality: More grainy than imagecopyresampled(). Not very good for bigger destination images, I think. Speed: In my tests, it was only faster if destination size was smaller than ~200x200 pixel. The function becomes slower and slower the bigger the destination image gets. In contrast, imagecopyresampled() finished at the same speed, no matter how big the destination was. My source image resoloution ~ 1500x2000 pixel. ---- Manual Page -- http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.imagecopyresampled.php Edit -- http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=edit+44653 Delete -- http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=delete+44653&report=yes Reject -- http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=reject+44653&report=yes Search -- http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php