note 53386 added to language.oop5.decon
| From: | kida at keymail dot it | Date: | Tue, 31 May 2005 07:59:31 +0000 |
| Subject: | note 53386 added to language.oop5.decon | ||
| Groups: | php.notes | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-notes+get-89667@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Well:
class A
{
public function __construct()
{
//do something
}
}
class B extends A
{
protected function __construct()
{
parent::__construct();
}
}
You can't make this becouse B::__construct() MUST have the same visibility or a weaker
visibility of A::__construct() !!??!!
SO I THINK it's better
class A
{
public function A()
{
//do something
}
}
class B extends A
{
protected function B()
{
parent::A();
}
}
Because it works. Instead of what they're saying ;)
----
Manual Page -- http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.decon.php
Edit -- http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=edit+53386
Delete: added to the manual -- http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=delete+53386&report=yes&reason=added+to+the+manual
Delete: bad code -- http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=delete+53386&report=yes&reason=bad+code
Delete: spam -- http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=delete+53386&report=yes&reason=spam
Delete: useless -- http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=delete+53386&report=yes&reason=useless
Delete: other reasons -- http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=delete+53386&report=yes
Reject -- http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php?action=reject+53386&report=yes
Search -- http://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php