Re: cvs: pearweb /include pear-format-html.php /public_html style.css
| From: | Daniel Convissor | Date: | Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:24:04 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: pearweb /include pear-format-html.php /public_html style.css | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.cvs php.pear.core |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-cvs+get-18634@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi:
I'm cc'ing pear-core on this. That IS the right list for the following,
right?
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 03:03:58PM -0000, Martin Jansen wrote:
> mj Fri Apr 23 11:03:58 2004 EDT
>
> Modified files:
> /pearweb/include pear-format-html.php
> /pearweb/public_html style.css
> Log:
> * Improving XHTML validity
>
> # Patch by: dufuz
... snip ...
> - <td align="right" valign="top" colspan="3"
> height="1"> </td>
> + <td colspan="3" style="height: 1px; text-align: right;
> vertical-align: top;"> </td>
I disagree with the direction this patch is going. Nearly all browsers
can understand the old syntax. A limited set of browsers can understand
the new syntax. Granted the number of people using browsers that can't
understand the new syntax is small, there's no good reason to mess them
up.
Also, for long term flexibility and ease of design, I feel it's best to
put a class name in the element itself and then specify the style in a
style sheet rather than specifying the style directly in the element.
Thanks for your consideration,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
data intensive web and database programming
http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/
4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f: 718-854-0409