Cool. Glad to see this getting into CVS!
Same here. =)
Three of the votes for this package expressed reservations with putting this package being in the Services category:
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id=198&handle=wenz
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id=198&handle=justinpatrin
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id=198&handle=bolk
I share those reservations. Perhaps put it in the Text or HTML categories? Please, a consensus on where to put this should be reached before the first release.
Thanks,
--Dan
I was also happy to see this commit.
Congrats Michal !
As for other classes,
I really like to see client executable code included.
For the category,
if javascript belongs to html , then HTML category.
That should be, as javascript belongs to public.
Just not the server of it.
I would add a call for a new role by pear installer , client script , as javascript
Should be in some public area.
I feel the same way - I think all that's needed is a change in permissions for my CVS directory access, right? Text_JSON makes some sense... All the XML stuff has its own top-level category, and I feel that JSON is approx. on the same level as XML though obviously not as wide-spread. Would it be presumptuous to start a JSON or Javascript category, that might house an RPC lib and other toys in the future?
-mike.
----------------------------------------------------------------
michal migurski- contact info and pgp key:
sf/ca http://mike.teczno.com/contact.html