Re: cvs: pear /PEAR_Frontend_Gtk package.xml
| From: | Tomas V.V.Cox | Date: | Thu, 13 Jun 2002 15:50:24 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: pear /PEAR_Frontend_Gtk package.xml | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.cvs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-cvs+get-4602@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Martin Jansen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 15:27:46 -0000, Alan Knowles wrote:
>
> >alan_k Thu Jun 13 11:27:46 2002 EDT
> >
> > Modified files:
> > /pear/PEAR_Frontend_Gtk package.xml
> > Log:
> > attempting to fix package file
> >
> >Index: pear/PEAR_Frontend_Gtk/package.xml
> >diff -u pear/PEAR_Frontend_Gtk/package.xml:1.4 pear/PEAR_Frontend_Gtk/package.xml:1.5
> >--- pear/PEAR_Frontend_Gtk/package.xml:1.4 Thu Jun 13 05:37:02 2002
> >+++ pear/PEAR_Frontend_Gtk/package.xml Thu Jun 13 11:27:46 2002
> >@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
> > <filelist>
> > <dir name="/" baseinstalldir="PEAR/Frontend">
> > <file role="php">Gtk.php</file>
> >- <dir name="Gtk">
> >+ <dir name="Gtk" role="php">
>
> If this is really required by the packager, I'm strongly +1 for
> changing this: I don't see a good point why a directory should have a
> role, since it may be possible that one directory may contain files of
> different types.
>
The <dir role="XXX"> is just for lazy developers. A way of saying: "all
the files inside this dir are of role XXXX if no other is specified".
Tomas V.V.Cox