RE: [PEAR-DEV] Cache_Lite 1.0 ?

> First, wouldn't Cache benfit from "protection against cache corruption"? If > this feature is useful for a high traffic site, isn't it also useful to a > low traffic site? I mean, such a feature might not be *required* by a low > traffic site, but I don't think it would hurt a low traffic site. You are right :-) But it would slow Cache a little more. I don't know Sebastian's or Christian's plan (Cache leaders) about this possibility. > Second, what are the goals of Cache_Lite and Cache? I can't seem to find > that in the docs for either. I will make a real doc for Cache_Lite when peardoc2 is become the official doc. Now, there is a big example file (docs/examples) describing the different possibilities of the class. IMHO, goals are : - Cache_Lite : fast, light and safe (Cache_Lite is really fast, the core class is light and can be embedded in bigger projects and last but not least, Cache_Lite is really safe because completly protected against cache corruption) - Cache : features, flexibility (Cache has more features, and can be used with a file container, a DB container. Moreover, it has an automatic garbage collector...) Fab