Re: Update: phpDocumentor development
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Sun, 01 Dec 2002 14:29:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Update: phpDocumentor development | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev php.pear.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-11273@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:38:30 -0500
"Greg Beaver" <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> There have been some issues with the PEAR release of phpDocumentor due
> to problems in pear.in for windows which render the project unusable
> without minor adjustments. These problems have been fixed and will be
> available with the next release. In the meantime, a clean install
> from http://www.phpdoc.org will work until the PEAR release is
> fixed
> up.
What kind of problem did you get with pear.in under windows ? There is a
known bug due to php constants, which will be hopefully solved with the
4.3.0 release. But basically, it is easier to fix manually.
The main problem I have with phpDocumentor is the name of the command,
which is the same as the PHPDoc (phpdoc), which make impossible to
install the both packages.
> The other larger problem involved a new DocBook
> format for package-level docs (tutorials would go there).
How do you plan the use of phpDocumentor for the creation of tutorials ?
My favourite idea for this purpose is to allow people to use their
favourite word processing tools and convert it to docbook. This is the
way I choose for DocConvert. That makes the work easier for the authors
as well for the translators.
> Currently, the spec calls for html-format package-level docs, but html
> is not rigorous enough to convert back into DocBook reliably. By
> allowing a subset of DocBook tags (basically everything but the table
> tags), it is possible to use the same derivative parser with a few
> changes to parse DocBook-style package pages and spit out html-ready
> or pdf-ready package pages.
html-ready or pdf-ready, or, xxxx-ready in any case ?
In others words, is it one or another format and not a generic format ?
I should help you on the tutorials parts, which I consider as a real
separate need.
I do not know if you solved the package.xml issue, my last test to
install it failed. I may help you too here, and make it a little more
clean and reliable (using dir or install-as when needed).
hth
pierre