Re: package.xml and PECL modules

On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 08:56, George Schlossnagle wrote: > role="src" works. Perhaps your pear is out of date? argh, indeed, there were 2 different pear programs on my computer... thanks for the hint chregu > > I just built a release with apd a few days ago, so I know the roles > used in it's package.xml are up-to-date. > > On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 02:29 AM, Christian Stocker wrote: > > > Hi > > > > I just wanted to write a correct package.xml for ext/imagick and didn't > > succeed (I mean, writing a correct file list, so that installation is > > quite easy or even automatically) > > > > I know, it worked once with role="src", but not anymore. role="ext" > > just > > installs these files in the extension directory, which is the wrong > > place for c-sources and role="extsrc" just complains about: > > "Error: Makefile.in: no source files" > > > > Does it really not work right now (which I could live with for the time > > being :) ) or did I miss something? > > > > chregu > > > > > > -- > > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- christian stocker | bitflux GmbH | schoeneggstrasse 5 | ch-8004 zurich phone +41 1 240 56 70 | mobile +41 76 561 88 60 | fax +41 1 240 56 71 http://www.bitflux.ch | chregu@bitflux.ch | gnupg-keyid 0x5CE1DECB