Re: Registering PECL pear web
| From: | Michael Bretterklieber | Date: | Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:27:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Registering PECL pear web | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-11738@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
Mika Tuupola wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Michael Bretterklieber wrote:<type>PECL</type> or <type>PHP</type> bye, -- ------------------------------- ---------------------------------- Michael Bretterklieber - Michael.Bretterklieber@jawa.at JAWA Management Software GmbH - http://www.jawa.at Liebenauer Hauptstr. 200 -------------- privat ------------ A-8041 GRAZ GSM: ++43-(0)676-93 96 698 Tel: ++43-(0)316-403274-12 E-mail: mbretter@inode.at Fax: ++43-(0)316-403274-10 http://www.bretterklieber.com ------------------------------- ---------------------------------- "...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..." - Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972I would like to register my radius-PECL with the pear-web (http://pear.php.net/package-new.php). What should I choose as package name? Radius or NET_Radius? PECL's have no category, should I choose Networking here?This bring me to another question. How do we differ PECL packages on pearweb? Currently you can only guess from different naming scheme (for example mailparse http://pear.php.net/package-info.php?pacid=143) I think people should be able to easily see which packages need compiling and which dont. maybe we should add a <type> entity to the package.xml?