RE: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [binarycloud-dev] RE: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [binarycl oud-dev] Re: [PEAR-DEV] PEAR PackageRequirementsand binarycloud

> >> -Dependency support that's smart (install + uninstall) > > > > dependency check is in there .. dunno if it is capable of handling > > downgrades or incompatibilities (dunno if that is needed at all) > > Well we can add that if we need it later I think. > >> -Package builds > >> -Package checks > > > > both are fairly easy .. check sum support is done? (or > atleast around > > the corner) > > Yep. It does checksum. > > >> -"Mirror" support for repositories eventually. Prefer > a proxy or > > other > >> system to the stupid CPAN "select-a-site" method. > > > > I saw Stig post about that a few days ago > > > > Generally Stig should be the man to talk to about the Installer. Stig post was <quote> The /get/Package functionality can simply produce a redirect. </quote> > Stig? > > What are your opinions on this? > > We're nearly done with the build system, and we need to > decide if we're > going to use the PEAR packagexml, and have the build system > partially rely > on it. > > The sooner I can make a decision, the better. I left this a > little long. :) > > _alex The longest part is to write the package.xml, especially the files list :) Arnaud.