Re: Patch suggestion regarding pgsql nextid

Troels Arvin wrote: > > Hello, > > I couldn't get PEAR to work with my Postgresql (v. 7.1.2). Maybe because > Postgresql has changed it's error message when running nextid() on a > non-existing sequence? Yes, you're true. Hope we get Postgres error codes some day :) > Anyways, the patch suggestion is posted below. The patch is for current > CVS. Thanks, it's commited now in the last CVS release. > By the way: I think it's very disturbing that PEAR enforces > that sequences be named "...._seq". - But I'm afraid that this > is too late to change now :-( Perhaps no very db-admin friendly, but very intuitive to the developer because he doesn't need to remember the sequence name for certain table (it's just the same name). Tomas V.V.Cox