Re: approved package: final name for commit

No suggestions yet for a final package name. Martin Jansen once opted for "DB_DOM" http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=103148968001550&w=2 Lukas Smith for "DB_XML" http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=103149016001829&w=2 As our current version is named DB_DOM anyway, do you agree if we chose this name? Sandro On Friday 24 January 2003 13:46, Sandro Zic wrote: > Hi! > > Some time ago (september), our class has been approved to become part of > PEAR. More information covers this thread/message: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=103211457902241&w=2 > > Meanwhile, the main author of this package did a rewrite and the code is > now ready to be committed to CVS. Unfortunately, the final name of this > package has not yet been decided. > > As it is a class based on PEAR::DB for DOM-like management of XML content > stored in a defined RDBMS table structure, the following names may suit: > > - DB_DOM > - DB_XML > - DB_XML_DOM > - XML_DB > - XML_DB_DOM > > ... maybe some more ideas? > > Please let me know your oppinions on that. > > Thanks, > Sandro