Re: Re: Pear/Sockets Announcement
| From: | Stephan Seidt | Date: | Wed, 29 Jan 2003 13:33:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Pear/Sockets Announcement | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-12817@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
hihi that is the stuff i wrote some months ago ;)
we came to the result that node would be to general.
i think "Socket" or "Sockets" would be nice.
and you?
bye
Bertrand Mansion wrote:
<paj@pearfr.org> wrote :-- IPv6 + TCPA + wrecked Palladium server = NO COFFE!On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 13:53:47 +0100 Stephan Seidt <blizz@0x03.net> wrote:Yep, just one comment, off topic though: you should have a look at your mail subject line before posting :) Bertrand Mansion Mamasamhm.. don't know if it was clear.. but if nobody disagrees. everybody agrees with the name "Sockets" ?That sounds good as far as this thread has been closed and the new category approved: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=103812479205371&w=2 That was a discussion about a new top category Socket (Sterling's suggestions, quit good ;). But that raises the question about the current Net_Socket package. Comments ?