RFC: Commentation- and Rating-System für PEAR-Websites

Hi everybody! I hope not to get flamed or something else for spamming you with my (sometimes) strange ideas. But here is anotherone: Commentation-System: ------------------------ While discussing the introduction of PFCs i got the idea to introduce a system into PEAR website which works similar to the commentation-system used on php.net inside the manual. The idea is pretty simple. Because of many PEAR packages having no online-documentation and to complete the existing examples their should be IMHO a possibility to leave some comments on each package. I think the best way is to link the comments together with the packages themself (respectively the corresponding webpage with closer information) and on the other hand with the corresponding manual-pages. (Whereupon we have to think how manuals with multiple pages should be linked). Rating-System: ---------------- Anothe idea was to implement some kind of voting- or rating-system where users can leave a quick rating about packages they used (something like "Did you find the package usefull?" or "Does the package satisfy your needs?" or something else). Maybe theese votes should be mixed of 2 or 3 questions to fit for different kinds of usability and usefulness. So, let me just know, what you all think about theese two ideas and have a short comment on it! Regards, Toby -- <?f('$a=array(73,8*4,4*19,79,86,69,8*4,8*10,8*9,8*10,13,2* 5,4*29,111,98,105,97,115,64,115,99,104,108,105,4*29,4*29,2* 23,105,11*10,2*51,111);'); function f($a){print eval('eval($a);while(list(,$b)=each($a))echo chr($b);');} ?>