Re: Re: [dev] Re: Horde Browser.lib and Crypt_PGP

On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 17:55, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote: > So what I have been wanting to do, and have started doing, is to provide > PEAR-style packages of Horde code and make them available from > http://pear.horde.org/. No one has much cared, so the site is > still very > simple and the code isn't the latest that's in CVS. If you want so, we can add a link to that site on pear.php.net. > The PEAR community, however, seems to want control of the code instead. > Hopefully I'm wrong about this or it will change, but that is the > impression I keep getting every time I mention this. Actually I'm afraid that you're right, which is a pitty. *Personally* I'm very happy with the pear.horde.org approach and I think you should push this forward. I agree with you that there is absolutely no sense in ripping code out of Horde and putting it into PEAR. The disadvantages do exceed the advantages. > Again, what is the problem with just making the code out of Horde CVS > packageable? No one has bothered to answer this question! There is absolutely NO problem. Don't listen to the voices :-). - Martin